And after all, exynos 2100 failed. SAMSUNG GALAXY S21 Ultra has shown great testing

Anonim

Still, Samsung did not work out cool! But this is if you believe the results of the new, very large and important testing of new Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra flagships on all possible test platforms. Probably such a way is quite accurate, if you compare the same smartphone, working on the platforms from Samsung and Qualcomm. And here, alas, the version on the new excellent flagship exynos 2100 received for the collar.

This testing was also with rather strange conditions, because additional cooling was used for devices. And for the version on Exynos 2100, the fan was used, and even the refrigerator. But the model on Snapdragon 888 cost only this fan and feels well.

In identical conditions (additional cooling with a fan), Samsung Galaxy S21 ULTRA based on Exynos 2100 simply loses analogue on Snapdragon 888 in performance. But if Exynos 2100 stamps into the refrigerator, then the results become approximately equal. However, the conditions here, you know, are completely different.

And after all, exynos 2100 failed. SAMSUNG GALAXY S21 Ultra has shown great testing 9412_1
Signature to the picture

Testing data in benchmarks suggest that exynos 2100 is managed to consume 18-35% more energy than Snapdragon 888 under the same conditions. And this means that autonomy from Exynos 2100 suffers greatly. Well, productivity is a separate song. Under normal conditions, Exynos 2100 goes into trottling so early that there is no chance there is no chance to impose a fight Snapdragon 888.

If it is examined in detail in the original source, then in principle everything will be about the same. Samsung was again unable to do as promised. But the tests are quite fun. Why screwed fans to smartphones and throw in refrigerators? Still, we are talking about smartphones that we will use in our hands, and not about steep acceleration of processors on liquid nitrogen for the sake of numbers.

Eh, and we hoped so much on exynos 2100 that it would be better than competitors. Yes, and such good news on top were where this chipset showed excellent results. But again it did not work. Maybe the next time samsung is lying?

Read more