Schoolchildren need a honest conversation, and not commissioners

Anonim

Schoolchildren need a honest conversation, and not commissioners 8811_1

The appearance of the "Advisor to the School Director for Education" I perceive as recognition of the non-professionalism of the director himself. It's humiliating. What am I for the teacher, if I need some kind of education adviser? Such a teacher must be driven from the profession in the neck.

A competent teacher is also a class teacher. And in the lessons, and outside the lessons, he leads educational work, it enters his duties. There are provision such as the organizer of extracurricular work, it organizes excursions, hiking, theatrical festivals. The question arises: why do I need a commissioner?

It is assumed that these people, in contrast to professional teachers, are able to talk with children in the same language, they are interested in their computer games ... In subtext, a very simple thing: they work with a shkolota, so that it does not go to rallies. But if the extraneous uncle and aunt will start climbing children in the soul, except for laughter, it will not cause anything and can hardly be able to find contact with the guys. There are the concepts of "schoolchildren", "teenagers" - where did the "shkolota" come from? This is a slang, which means "juvenile assholes", "bellows", which only write off capable. The most backward, the taught part of schoolchildren. And when there was a conversation that the shkolota will enter the streets and it is necessary to make the school and parents to answer for it, another new term appeared - political pedophilia.

All this causes allergies for the simple reason that the forbidden fruit is always sweet. No prohibitive measures do not act and act will not. With children need to talk seriously, in an adult. There are no forbidden topics for conversations. And when we are trying to get away from the conversation, it turns out an excess.

I myself am against the children to participate in all mass barns, I have a negative experience of participating in the events of August 1991. Some young people, not schoolchildren, those, fortunately, were on vacation, the tarpaulin on the gaps of the BTR, and Other young people with fright shot. As a result, "no one wanted to die," then - solemn funerals, the heroes of the Soviet Union ... Who now remembers the names of these heroes and what is happening with their mothers?

In order not to happen this, you need to talk to children. In our political space, we are talking exclusively about prohibitive measures: drag and not to be bred. The Ministry of Enlightenment, by the way, was on the other, very good initiative: to arrange a meta-salary as an entrance ticket to the exam, where children should demonstrate the ability to drive correctly discussions, distinguishing fake news from reality, judgments from facts not to draw conclusions based on one fact. This is a very important competence - the development of critical thinking so that the teenagers will be able to defend against manipulation. It is necessary for both children and adults, and teachers. Already today, "inverted lessons" are given in advanced schools - some historical fact is taken, archival documents are being studied, various points of view are expressed. The discussion unfolds, and the teacher acts as a moderator of this discussion. Watch that children do not go to the personality so that they argued argued. It is favorably different from television talk shows, where adult solid people wipe off each other.

I watched with sadness and laughing as our authorized for the rights of the child said that in the east of the country, children had a rational for Navalny on a par with adults. There was a feeling that almost a kindergarten came out with pots to the forefront and poured OMON out of them. And this is a fake! He was blinded by one lady in Vladivostok, no checking his official subjected and, roughly speaking, was enlipped. Therefore, on the one hand, it is necessary to give a libez on critical thinking, on the other - the discussion of the amendments to the Law on Education, where educational activities should be subjected to censorship. Officials are not brought to school to school, they claim that God for the beard also took and their only point of view - the right one. But inside the country there are historians who have completely different points of view on what is happening. And why am I have no right to invite foreign specialists to the lesson? We witnessed some global fear, helpless attempts to reverse time. America can be discovered, but it is impossible to close it.

As reheetles, "noise, brother, noise". With children need to talk honestly. Otherwise we will lose respect. Otherwise, children from schools will really fall out on the streets and become objects of manipulation - all sorts of politicians and unfair people.

The author's opinion may not coincide with the position of the VTIMES edition.

Read more