Taldykorgan. 9th of March. KazTAG - at JSC "Kazakhtelecom" sued and appealed to the prosecutor's office for registration in the mid-2019 of the services at Nurlan Abilgaysanov, who died in the spring of 2018, the agency correspondent reports.
"I have already sent statements to the court and the prosecutor's office with complaints about Kazakhtelecom. Even after they recognized that they had issued services on my father almost two years after his death, and accrued debt on him, none of the Kazakhtelecom did not bother to provide documents confirming the lack of accounts with debts. No one has yet concluded for the fact that for two years "Kazakhtelecom" mocked the ashes of my father. Moreover, Kazakhtelecom considers its actions substantiated. We demand from the "Kazakhtelecom" compensation of moral damage, "said KazTAG editorial board on Tuesday Nazgul Abilgaysanova - daughter of the deceased Nurlan Abilgaysanova.
She stressed that she had receipts, notifications and all other documents confirming the illegality of actions of the National Operator.
We will remind, on March 4, it became known that Kazakhtelecom himself opened his account on the deceased and charged debts in the Aksi district of the Almaty region. It is noteworthy that the account was opened in the village of Sagabuyen, in which neither the deceased nor his relatives ever lived, being inhabitants of the village of Egyss.
"When I tried to apply, the investigator dissuaded me. It turned out that they all know each other there and this was all tested by the "Kazakhtelecom" operator, on the basis of the data from somewhere on the disability of my father. Police and staff "Kazakhtelecom" persuaded me not to raise the noise and pick up a statement, with me, "Kazakhtelecom" employees threw off and closed the debt, and stated that the subscriber account is also closed. "Kazakhtelecom" even issued a certificate of the absence of debts. That operator then flew quickly to another place and it works peacefully. After that, there was a year and yesterday the dad was put on the name of the Pope, "the daughter of the deceased appeaset on March 4.
On March 5, "Kazakhtelecom" recognized the opening of the account to the name of the deceased and accrual of debts on him, but he considered his actions substantiated. At the same time, how the connection at the specified address in Sagabuene is reasonable, if Nurlan Abilgiansanov lived all his life in Egy's, the national operator did not explain.
In the press service of "Kazakhtelecom" on the same day, they promised to provide a refined response on this occasion, however, the editors skeptically evaluates the likelihood of obtaining clear comments, since the "answers received on March 5, several preceding appeals of the agency's journalists remained unanswered. Neither the head of the press service of Kazakhtelecom Sarabi Bakirov nor the Chairman of the Board of Kuanysh Essekheyev did not comment on March 5 many other critical materials with complaints about the actions of the Nationalist.
The case in the Aksusky district of the Almaty region is far from the first to when "Kazakhtelek" this kind of claim is presented. Thus, on January 15, he was reported that a resident of Kostanaya accused the national operator that he "under the cumsions" attributes to subscribers to subscribers ", and on February 14, the Kazakhstan journalist Inna Rudakov accused Kazakhtelecom in setting accounts for months, the missing Internet and accrual of penalties for Lack of payment for not services provided.
Even earlier - in the spring of 2020, KazTAG reported that the prosecutor's office in Kostanay demanded to recognize the charges of the contracts with consumers who signed a contract with the condition for providing certain discounts for early termination of the contract. The telecom operator ordered subscribers to produce a double payment or compensate the difference in tariffs between the cost of a standard package and a package with a discount, considering it by reimbursement of the difference.
The court eventually stood on the side of the monopolist, stating that dual payment is a coordinated solving of the operator and the subscriber. The prosecutor's office emphasized that not all buyers of the preferential package understood which document to sign, pointing to the fact that we were paying for not the services provided illegally.