The trial in the case of seizing Maz near the Pushkinskaya metro station approached the final. Today, February 2, with the last word, accused Dmitry Dubkov, who recall, was recognized by human rights defenders political prisoners. The young man, in particular, declared that he recognizes the guilt within the framework of administrative legislation. In the afternoon, the verdict was announced: 7 years of the colony of the reinforced regime.
The process of Dmitry Dubkov came with an already familiar notebook written by small handwriting. Obviously, a young man thoroughly prepared for a speech.
- Our GOSSI fell in love with the word "technique", and I would like to advise one of them - the book "Bottle Dvor" J. Orwell, - he first applied to the film crew of one of the TV channels that came to the process. - We live like a fairy tale, not otherwise ...
Despite the fact that the session did not come the victims, the accused nevertheless brought them an apology "for what happened to that night" (from 10 to 11 August 2020).
- I perceive such accusations to your side as an insult, "said Dmitry Dubkov on the occasion of Article 214 of the Criminal Code (hijacking). - Since I am a professional driver. My father works all life on various kinds of technique. I know what aggression is driving, violence, how trucks are robbed.
"Make a similar one for me anyway to betray yourself."
- The Criminal Code says that any crime has both a subjective and objective side, - reminded the accused. - From the objective side, this is an unlawful vehicle coverage and a trip to it without the purpose of theft. With subjective - direct intent. It was like? No ... it proves victims, witnesses and videos.
The young man confirmed: he does not deny that the car overtakes. However, the formulation was surprised at the previous meeting of the state procurement, "about suddenly arising preliminary collusion."
"In my opinion, these are Antonyms," Dmitry Dubkov continued. - The video is clearly indicated that the driver from this group did not have. I have emerged at least five minutes after the phrase "keys is there for the first time. Who knows how to led? " Accordingly, the driver was not, I could not know what I was committing any crime. [...] I took the keys from one person who, in my opinion, was the owner of the car, overtakers at his request and returned the keys to him.
He also assured that the opinion of people surrounded (some of them were offered to "enter the riot police") it was little interested. The young man drew attention: the call to send the car to the police officers sounded when he had already started the move, while he refused to commit a crime.
- Was it hijacking? There was no hijacking ... there was a group of persons? There was no group of persons ... - expressed the opinion of the accused.
According to Dmitry Dubkov, the mass riots associated with the armed resistance to employees of the ATS, did not occur, since people and security officials were at that moment at a sufficient distance from each other.
- There was a traffic jam - yes. There were signals - yes, - listed the accused. - Did I participate in any unauthorized event? Yes. But this is Article 23.34 (Code of Administrative Offenses. - Approx. Onliner), and not 293 of the Criminal Code ("Mass Rights". - Approx. Onliner), and this is not seven years for what, in fact, did not.
The young man expressed his attitude towards a civil suit (served in the interests of "Minsktrans" by 21.8 thousand rubles): "I removed the car from point A and put it to the point B. If he had remained at the same place, it would also block the same traffic".
Stressed that he recognizes the guilt within the framework of administrative legislation - under Art. 23.34 and partially under Art. 18.1 Administrative Code (intentional blocking of transport communications).
- And what incriminates the state procurement and preliminary investigation, it is unacceptable. In the legal state, this non-compliance with laws. In fact, I was held in captivity in fact, - the ending of the speech turned out to be emotional. - In August, in August, our media called me the attackers, and this insult ... After that, requesting seven years ... For what? I killed someone?
"Yes, I do not agree with the results of the elections. I believe that our state acts in the interests of one person. And agree with this is stupid. I do not understand why this happens. "
Supplemented
In the afternoon of Tuesday, Elena Zhukovich, the judge of the Soviet district of Minsk, was sentenced in this case: 7 years of imprisonment with the serving of punishment in the colony of the reinforced regime. The decision has not yet entered into legal force. The accused there is ten days to appeal.
Meanwhile, the release of Onliner was the video recorders made by recorders who were installed on the masse. These rollers were shown in the courtroom, but only participants in the process could see the screen. In fact, the video confirms what the victims, witness and Dmitry Dubkov said.
Previous Publications on the topic:
AUTO.ONLINER in Telegram: Furnishing on the roads and only the most important news
Is there something to tell? Write to our telegram-bot. It is anonymously and fast