Hi, COVID-19, and all his consequences! Unfortunately, because of the pandemic in Russia, it became more unemployed, and the topic of job search is now more relevant. And if candidates have to reduce the requirements, since it is not particularly necessary to choose, then companies are sometimes offered not the best conditions for work. We decided to figure out that not so with the requests of the employers and how in the interview to a good organization, not to be in the span.
That in the description of the vacancy should alert
Stress toleranceIf your profession does not provide in the principle of stressful conditions, we advise you to alert when you see this item in the requirements for the vacancy. Most likely, the hassle will be provided with you, and from the most unexpected perspectives. Suppose you plan to get a secretary and the main task - close interaction with the boss and the execution of administrative work. In this situation, the likelihood that the candidate with a strong psyche and truly Zensky calm can suffer is great in this situation.
Sometimes the nature of the work suggests a regular collision with a negative, as it happens with constant communication with clients. But if you do, for example, programming and no one should report, besides the bosses, think well, whether it is worth it. After all, there is a high probability that in addition to the inadequacy of the manual, you will have to face a huge load and quite strict requirements. What, by the way, is justified, if for this work you promise a lot more salary than in other companies.
Salary from 30 to 100 thousandEven HR specialists openly talk about the fact that the big salary rank, specified in the vacancies, is a reason to alert. It is justified only if your income is directly dependent on interest. In other cases, the employer should justify why such a big difference in numbers. If everything is maximally transparent, the selection specialist, as a rule, indicates the vacancy by one amount and explains at the interview, from which it can develop. Unfortunately, often a large interval says that you will receive, most likely, the money that is indicated at the beginning.
We also advise you to think if you see in the description of the vacancy too much digit. A novice specialist cannot earn the same as director. At least, honestly.
Illuminated requirements for modest wagesIt is sad that it was too many employers who want to hire superskalists for young money. The candidates themselves also do not lag behind them, drawing in the summary of the figures that do not correspond to their level of experience and education. And how it is good that both sides are as a result of reducing requests, since such searches have the property to be delayed.
Nevertheless, today it is the employer who dictates its conditions on the labor market. Therefore, you can meet so many vacancies where you need a young specialist with higher education, advanced training courses and twenty years of experience at a salary of 17 thousand. This is not a joke at all - on recruiting sites, such descriptions are often found. These are more commonly vacancies of government officials to such posts as the chief librarian or the head of public relations to the local theater.
Of course, there are professions in which the galloping schedule is a normal story. For example, journalists must promptly inform the population. Doctor, police officer, chief engineer and electrician can also work on special conditions, if provided for by the collective agreement. In any case, there must be objective reasons for this, and all recycling employer is obliged to pay for the law. If you are not sure that it is ready for overtime, it is better to immediately pass by such a job.
Negative feedback from employeesAbout large companies former workers sometimes write reviews. You can read them by driven by the name in the search bar with the "Black List" or "Antijob" mark. If the employer has serious problems with a reputation, most likely, you will immediately hug on negative comments. Often they are published in the afternoon with dithyrabs and angry messages that it is a slander of dismissed employees. Boldly scroll through the vacancy if you see such words in the list of basic claims as: "Fraud", "constant salary delays", "sect". In other cases, try to lean on their own feelings and form an opinion on the basis of a conversation with the management of the company.
What can not speak at the interview
So, you have settled conditions prescribed in vacancies, and the company itself proposes to organize a meeting with the leader. On the Internet, a lot has already been written on the topic that it is possible and cannot be spent on the interview, but each candidate has to make mistakes. Let's talk about the main.
Violate the distanceIt is not only about the transition of personal borders, but also about the challenges of the problems on the employer and the conversations are not on the topic of the vacancy. Even if at the interview with you behave as if you are old friends, clap your shoulder and smile warmly, try not to succumb to provocations. It is such a trusting attitude to provoke a candidate to give slack and get out of the professional framework. Remember you are assessed as a potential employee. Be open, as far as possible in this situation, but do not forget what you came for.
To be toxicAbout the former employers, as well as the dead, speak either well or nothing. In the original, this statement ends with the words "except truth", but we understand that there are few people who love. If you have any claims, tell me the most correctly about them. And yes, unlike most recruiters, we do not advise it to be silent about it. Adequate guide in any case will take your words correctly. In the end, we spend most of your life at work and have the right to choose the bosses with which it will really be comfortable.
Do not ask questionsA stick about two ends: the employer does not like when it is interrogated, but the silence of a candidate for an interview can be regarded as a lack of interest in the vacancy. Although there are chiefs who tell so in detail about the duties that there is really nothing to ask. In this case, it remains only to thank for an excellent excursion. This, by the way, is a very relevant attitude towards working issues. You can be sure that this company knows clear tasks to subordinate.
But if there are still questions, do not hesitate to ask them, especially if you communicate with a future boss. This does not talk about your low intellectual abilities or incomprehensibility. So you show that it is really interested in work and trying to better understand its specifics.
And yes, forget about the fool's councils that are forbidden to ask about the salary. This is a really important point, because we come to work primarily for money, and then for the implementation of ambitions and communication. Incorrectly starting with this question interview, but when it is nearing an end, it is possible to ask about the conditions of employment. And even more so wrong to pretend that the money is not at all interested - it forms a certain attitude of the leadership and says that you can leave as soon as you lose interest. The organization itself also does not have the right to demand from you a special attitude to the position and replacement of the company's values of your own values. Such an employer will never react with understanding that you may have family problems, children suffer and you can not physically delay at work for a couple of hours. He, of course, is not obliged, but if you want humanity, look for her elsewhere. In the end, there is a Labor Code, there are commitments to the company. And you must fulfill them to show a good result.
The lies of the employer is justified only when he changes the rules of the game itself. For example, it allows you to ask very personal questions or give promises that will not be able to execute. Of course, it is not necessary to openly talk about what you quit from another company because of the "sad chief" or because "Customers of real bloodshots." We have already written that the truth is needed, but smoothing sharp corners.
Here, rather, the question of your self-sustaining. You need to praise yourself, but do it right, told about achievements in projects and the bullet of the work done. Modestly note personal qualities that helped to achieve success, explain what role they played. And try not to exaggerate your merit. Check your honesty is quite simple - for this, it is even not necessary to call someone from your former leadership.
Do not lower your hands if the job did not work out in the first week of searching. A normal term for employment, according to recruiters, is two or three months. This is when it comes to a thoughtful approach to the selection of the company.
Of course, much depends on what claims you are presented to yourself and the future employer. Not always success depends on your self-testing or experience, especially in modern economic conditions. Therefore, finally, a small advice: Do not dismiss until you consider alternative employment options. And it will be honest if you report your decision before you make a statement on the table.