In the case of Serbine and Lenzneva interrogate experts linguists

Anonim
In the case of Serbine and Lenzneva interrogate experts linguists 12860_1

On February 18, another hearing was held in the Soviet district court on the suit of Feldscher Dmitry Seregin to the adviser to the governor of the Oryol region Sergey Lenznev about the protection of honor and dignity.

Experts of the Autonomous Non-Profit Organization "Moscow Center for Expertise and Evaluation" provided a court research results. And as a result of the dispute of the parties, the court came to the conclusion about the need to interrogate two experts - Moscow (who was preparing an examination) and Orlovsky (which he proposes to hear the defendant's side).

How to voiced by the court of lawyer Lenzneva, director of the Institute of Philology of the Oryol State University. OGU, Vladimir Panyushkin, prepared a review of the examination. In his opinion, the examination contained in Moscow contains contradictory conclusions, and does not respond to all the issues delivered by the court. And petitioned to interrogate Panyushkin as an expert. And also to re-examine, which was asked to entrust the doctor of philological sciences, professor of the department of the domestic philology of the Kostroma State University Tretyakova.

The side of the plaintiff led to this, because, Panyoshkin was already interrogated by the court as an expert, and secondly, how the lawyer of the plaintiff was voiced, "the conclusion has not yet announced and has not been investigated in court, the court gives the court, and the simple disagreement of the parties The defendant is not a reason for appointing re-examination. "

"In additional comments, Panyushkina see no sense, because he expressed his position as a witness protection. Obviously, Mr. Panyushkin, speaking on the side of the defendant, has a certain opinion regarding this trial. And it would be strange to see a slightly different conclusion on a linguistic examination, given that he had already expressed his opinion earlier. It would be strange if he had two diametrically opposite opinions on our judicial dispute, "Dmitry Seregin appeared in court.

Sergen also supported his lawyer and opposed additional examination.

"One expert opinion is already available, an expert who conducted it has appropriate qualifications and education. The conclusions that are in conclusion are completely readable and understandable, especially an effective conclusion - everything is described in an affordable language, so as not to go into the details of a scientific nature, "Sudegin said.

Earlier, Seregin declared in court that due to the legained position, the Oryol expert could be put pressure, and the court rejected this candidacy as an expert on the case. At the last hearing, this moment also commented on the side of the defendant. The lawyer Sergei Lenzneva noted that the person who conducted an examination received education in the Oryol State University. "Therefore, what actually fears were - it's not entirely clear," she added.

"When I said that expertise should be carried out outside the Oryol region, given the position of the defendant, I meant the territorial affiliation. A lot of specialists of the Central Federal District receive their education, I do not see anything reprehensible here. It was very important for us to receive this expertise in another region, "Seregin replied.

At the end of March, two experts will be heard by the court.

  • In August last year, Feldscher Dmitry Seregin filed to Lenznev. The reason for the application of Seregine, we recall, served asked from Lenznev after Sergey Mironov's leader Sergey Mironov to regional health care. Lenznev, among other things, called Sergina Balabol, he found it an insult and stated that he would sue the official. On the eve of the court, Lenzhnev once again called Seginina Balabol.
  • On February 15, during a press conference, Governor Andrei Klychkov answered the question of the correspondent "He", which concerned this situation. "I am a thick man, I calmly treat many things. Although sometimes I want and not calm. Let's deal with the law. Submitred - let's understand. Within the law. And so we will simply make a wall from the state and municipal authority in which you can throw anything anything, "said Cangkov then.

Read more